LSG Vs DC 2024: After back-to-back defeats, Delhi team is on a winning streak. They won the match against the Lucknow team by 6 wickets on Friday night. The Delhi team has shown its strength in both bowling and batting sections.. It has reached the ninth position from the tenth position in the points table. Batting first, the Lucknow team scored 167 runs in 20 overs. Ayush Badoni was the top scorer with 55* runs. Captain KL Rahul showed his strength with 39 runs. Among the Delhi bowlers, Kuldeep Yadav took three wickets and ruled the downfall of the Lucknow team.
After that, the Delhi team got down to the target and won by losing four wickets in 18.1 overs. Foreign batsman Fraser played a vital role in Delhi team's victory with 55 runs. Captain Rishabh Pant scored 41 runs and came into touch. But in this match, captain Rishabh Pant got into an argument with the umpire on the field. Pant had a long discussion with the umpire regarding the review.
Devdutt is batting in the fourth over of the Lucknow innings. Ishant Sharma is bowling. In this sequence, the umpire declared a ball bowled by Ishant as wide. Delhi captain Pant showed the “T-sign” to demand a review. But at that time Pant did not look towards the empire. On the other hand, the umpires felt that Pant was asking for a review as he showed the “T-sign”. Sent to third umpire for review. This caused confusion on the ground. Commentators at that time thought that Pant had an argument with the umpire and did not ask for a review.
Later the commentators modified their opinion. “Wide? isn't it In the review called for, it was stated that Pant was unhappy due to the use of the snico meter by the umpires, and that's why he got into an argument.. But is this the reason for this dispute? Another one? I don't know.. Australian cricket legend Gill Crist responded to this. “Irrespective of the format, the match should be under the control of the umpires. Players should play to advance the match in their presence. Even if pant or other players make complaints.. umpires should take the game forward.. not cause a break in the middle. Because if the audience is impatient then the story will be different. If the players are talking like that, penalty should be imposed,” Gill Christ clarified.
